Alerts and Updates
Pennsylvania Planned Communities and Condominiums in Light of Shaffer Decision: What Now?
February 9, 2010
Recently, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirmed, without opinion, the Commonwealth Court's decision in Shaffer Family Limited Partnership v. Zoning Hearing Board of Chanceford Township.1 This case has caused an uproar in the real estate development community. Many real estate developers and their attorneys are now asking, "What governmental approvals are required for the creation and use of planned community and condominium regimes in Pennsylvania?"
In its decision, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania held that the Shaffers' division of a tract of land into units, pursuant to the Pennsylvania Uniform Planned Community Act, and the subsequent transfer of one of those units—without first having received subdivision or land development approval—was unlawful.
Some legal practitioners have disagreed with this ruling. However, the Shaffer case is not a departure from existing law, and the court decision may not have much changed the legal landscape, if at all. Nonetheless, the result in the Shaffer case does illustrate one important consideration for real estate development: It is prudent to seek legal guidance in the proper use of planned communities and condominiums in order to take advantage of the significant development flexibility they can provide—and to avoid a result like that in the Shaffer case.
For Further Information
If you have any questions about the proper creation and use of planned communities and condominiums, please contact Marc D. Brookman, David I. Haas, any other member of the Real Estate Practice Group or the attorney in the firm with whom you are regularly in contact.
- Frank N. Shaffer Family Ltd. P'ship v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Chanceford Twp., 2010 Pa. LEXIS 26 (Pa. Jan. 26, 2010), aff'g 964 A.2d 23 (Pa. Commw. Ct., 2008).
Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.