Skip to site navigation Skip to main content Skip to footer content Skip to Site Search page Skip to People Search page

Bylined Articles

Electronic Control Devices: Science, Law, and Social Responsibility

By Thomas Ringe III, Robert J. Myerburg and Kenneth W. Goodman
July 12, 2012
Circulation

Electronic Control Devices: Science, Law, and Social Responsibility

By Thomas Ringe III, Robert J. Myerburg and Kenneth W. Goodman
July 12, 2012
Circulation

Read below

Tom RingeThe use of deadly force by law enforcement personnel is a hot-button issue in contemporary society. Their responsibility is to handle life-threatening situations while, as much as possible, avoiding fatalities or serious injuries of suspects, bystanders, or themselves. In these settings, the use of lethal weapons must be weighed against reactions to circumstances that do not pose an imminent threat of a fatal outcome. Moreover, use of intense physical restraint instead of lethal weapons in less ominous situations is not without risk either, in that fatal events due to asphyxia have occurred as an unintended consequence of this nonlethal control strategy. In addition, the decision whether deployment of a lethal weapon, as opposed to physical restraint, is the proper action in a specific confrontation often must be made quickly, leaving little time for assessing options.

To continue reading this article, please visit the Circulation website.