The unanimous Supreme Court ruling rejects the VA's interpretation and restores to veterans broader competitive bidding opportunities.
In a ruling affecting billions of dollars of government contracts, and impacting tens of thousands of veteran-owned small businesses across the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously upheld expanded competitive bidding opportunities for veteran-owned small businesses in Kingdomware Technologies v. United States, 14-916. [Note: Duane Morris LLP represented the National Veteran Small Business Coalition and several other national veterans organizations and individual veteran-owned businesses as amici curiae in support of Kingdomware. Duane Morris has a longstanding tradition and commitment to pro bono work on behalf of veterans.]
The unanimous ruling means that veterans now will have (as Congress intended) expanded opportunities to compete for business with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) under the Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006 (“the Act”). The VA had argued for different limitations—not set forth in the statute itself—on the type and scope of contracts available for competitive bidding by and amongst veterans, and the Federal Circuit had allowed the VA to ignore the Act’s mandate for competitive bidding by veteran-owned small businesses. In practical terms, the VA’s interpretation resulted in roughly $10 billion of the VA’s $18 billion in annual purchases being exempt from the competitive bidding process by the veteran-owned small businesses that Congress had enacted. The unanimous Supreme Court ruling rejects that interpretation and restores to veterans the full competitive bidding opportunities that Congress intended.
Further background on the case may be found in posts on the Duane Morris Appellate Review Blog.
For Further Information
If you have any questions about this Alert, please contact Luke P. McLoughlin, Robert L. Byer, Kristina Caggiano Kelly, Michael E. Barnicle, any of the attorneys in our Appellate, Government Contracts or Trial Practice Groups or the attorney in the firm with whom you are regularly in contact.
Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.